Mark McHugh

Archive for the ‘Government’ Category

Is The SLV Wired To Blow?

In Conspiracy, Government, Humor, Leveraged ETF, Mary Schapiro, Open Thread, SEC, Silver, stocks finance on Friday, April 29, 2011 at 8:13 pm

I’m not real big on suspense, so I’ll tell you upfront, I think so.  Once again, we may be about to find out what happens when regulators are asleep at the switch.

As of this writing there are 364 million shares of SLV outstanding.  In the past five trading days (April 25 – 29) more than 755 million shares have been traded, and get this, more than 10 million ounces of silver were taken from the trust between the 26th and the 28th, taking available shares with them.  From :

Note: is the only free website that I know of that accurately tracks the number of ETF shares outstanding and changes (wish I could say the same of my broker).  Enter the ETF ticker with the suffix “.SO”

At what point does trading volume relative to existing shares become unbelievable?

Information on institutional holdings of ETF shares is also hard to find. but according to, 86 million shares of SLV are held by institutions, but that does not include any holdings reported since April 1, 2011.  And speaking of missing data, does anybody know where China Investment Corp’s 13F‘s  are?  The sovereign wealth giant filed its initial holdings with the SEC on February 5, 2010,   but no additional data has been released.  The SEC requires the form to be filed within 45 days of the quarter’s end. 

The point is that the SLV has become one of the most heavily traded instruments on our exchanges and there is an all too finite number of shares.  There’s at least some evidence that the SECs institutional holdings data is outdated and/or incomplete.   What happens when all the shares are spoken for?  If it hasn’t happened already (I suspect it has), it should soon…..

Then what?

Will the SEC suspend sales of the SLV?  Will the SLV start trading at huge premiums to NAV?  Will the SEC even notice?

I don’t know about you, but I’m going with “SEC will never notice,”  because they have no mechanism in place to ensure “shares owned” doesn’t exceed shares outstanding (remember Mary Schapiro’s only qualification to Chair the SEC is her inability to recognize a Ponzi).

Obviously if SLV starts trading at huge premiums, it isn’t tracking the price of silver anymore.  It will have a market dynamic unto itself.  Suspending sales until more silver is deposited with the trust  will immediately cause a run on physical silver the likes of which has never been seen before.  The silver exchange on the COMEX will blow up in a matter of minutes, followed shortly thereafter by JP Morgan and the class structure of western civilization.  If you don’t know how tight the silver supply is getting, take a peak at this chart from 24HOURGOLD:

Kudos to for doing a better job tracking the rapidly vanishing supply of registered silver than the COMEX!!!!  (Hope it’s OK I stole a screenshot).

To make matters even worse, SLV trades options.  Lots and lots and lots of options.  So when the shares outstanding are all sold, there will be people with call options, who have bought the right to buy shares of SLV at a given price.  Forcing cash settlement means the SLV no longer can claim to track the price of physical silver, because the purchase of silver by an authorized participant to create the shares to cover the options would have surely moved the price of the metal.

So once again America, ignoring the grim reality of the situation is the only logical course of action.  The SEC knows all too well that that’s what porn sites are for.  So unless somebody posts this on Pornhub……

I’m sure that Tyler Durden’s instincts will be proven correct again, when he stated that Blackrock’s Kevin Feldman’s defense of the SLV was a red flag in and of itself.  Blackrock is the sponsor of the SLV, and Kevin urged everyone to read the prospectus.  That was probably not such a good idea.  Be extra careful when you try to download the prospectus, I got the following warning:

Comedy ensued after using Firefox (safe mode) to view the prospectus:

“The sponsor does not exercise day-to-day oversight over the trustee or the custodian” 

Which seems to conflict with Kevin’s letter:

“At BlackRock, we take the responsibility of protecting shareholder interests very seriously and spend a lot of time constructing our iShares products to help ensure they meet investor expectations.”

So in reality Blackrock takes protecting shareholders about as seriously as the US Department of Justice takes perjury.  To his credit, Kevin did link to a list of bars the SLV holds in some vaults over in England.  The list was prepared by JP Morgan, because if you can’t trust them regarding silver, who can you trust?  Rather than spoil all the potential ways the SLV might not meet “investor expectations”, I thought it would be fun to make a contest of it (see comments).

The SLV pimps out the price action of the silver it holds to shareholders.  It can terminate the trust for a long list of reasons, not the least insignificant of which is if  the Authorized Participants (who actually own the silver) feel like it.

Suddenly everybody has an opinion of what the price of silver should be, but as JPM is now finding out, if you don’t have silver to sell your opinion doesn’t count.

I don’t wish any ill on SLV shareholders, but make no mistake, you don’t own silver.  History has not been kind to people who made similar mistakes,  and recent history should tell you no one is looking out for you. 

 Miscellaneous Fun Facts:

  • In February, 2007 the author contacted the SEC via email regarding Countrywide Financial CEO Angelo Mozilo’s insider trading.
  • In March 2007 the author applied for an SEC bounty regarding Angelo Mozilo’s insider trading (up to 10% of recovered amount) .  Countrywide’s stock was trading at about $37 at the time.  It would trade over $40 in May and implode to less than $5 by late 2007.
  • On June 4, 2009 (27 months later) the SEC charged Mozilo with insider trading and securities fraud.
  • In October 2010 Mozilo agreed to pay $67.5 million in fines to the SEC to settle the charges against him.
  • At its peak, Countrywide had a Market Cap of more than $26B.  Angelo Mozilo has an estimated net worth of $600 million.
  • The SLV currently has a Market Cap of approximately $17B.
  • The author never received a bounty from the SEC, because the Dodd-Frank “Financial Reform” legislation repealed the previous SEC bounty program.  Bounties can no longer be paid based on an outsider’s analysis of publicly available information.
  • In 2010, the author applied for a job as an “abusive trading practices specialist” with the SEC.  He received no reply.
  • In February 2011, the US dropped its criminal investigation against Mozilo.
  • Paybacks are a bitch.

Common sense (and a little math) tells me that the SLV is already a fraud.  When that becomes obvious to all is anyone’s guess, but based on my past experience, neither the SEC nor the CFTC will recognize it until about two years after it implodes.


Update:  Thanks a million to Steve Quayle!!!  He is the only major blogger who has linked to this story thusfar (kind of makes you wonder how much some of these other guys value truth).  This story needs to be discussed.  If you’ve got a blog, take this story and run with it!

****Max Keiser has now added the story too, Thanks Max!

****Jesse’s Crossroads cafe brought it big time!! Thank You, Jesse!


 I have to recognize all the people who helped this post see the light of day.  It had been getting easier for me to get things I’ve written promoted….then BAM!  The doors really got slammed in my face with “…Wired to Blow.”  I was confused and angry.  Then I realized something….

One way or another, most of the financial blogoshere is still pretty tight with Wall Street, and every financial pro who has recommended the SLV to clients dropped the proverbial due diligence ball.  I believe that’s why so many didn’t want this story told.  They’re probably going to have some explaining to do soon.   Luckily, a couple of big bloggers (Steve Quayle, Max Keiser and Jesse ) came to help, and I’m very grateful.  But they weren’t the only ones.

I get way more than my fair share of support from relatively small bloggers, just like me, and I have been remiss in recognizing their support.  I spend too much time feeling threatened and jealous of their talent.  But I must say, they really came through for me.  Just look at all the places I got hits from here.  All kidding aside, I am touched.  If you’re new here, feel free to take any of my original content (pictures and/or words).  If it is not credited to anyone else, it’s mine and therefore yours to share.  I’ll be adding a bunch of you guys to the blogroll very soon.

Thanks again,


Why Silver Is Still The Best Revenge

In Government, Open Thread, Silver, stocks finance on Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 10:21 pm

Author’s note:  Some of the info contained in this piece was published rather hastily earlier this week.  Please excuse the redundancies. 

Face it, former Goldman Sachs CEO Hank Paulson, who served as US Treasury Secretary just long enough to loot taxpayers is never going to jail. Neither are Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Angelo Mozilo, Phil Graham, Franklin Raines, Barney Frank…(I could do this all day).  Justice (much like truth) is a luxury Americans can no longer afford.

Silver is something most Americans can still afford, but aren’t smart enough to buy.  Maybe it’s because the concept that the supply of anything could be less-than-infinite is rejected here.  Or maybe they’re afraid someone might laugh and call them a conspiracy theorist.   Too bad, because they’ve already missed out on some really good laughs, with more to come.   The latest round of  jokes came from the CME group’s year to date metals delivery notices report.   Since December 2010, only 11 firms have been foolish enough to be net sellers of physical silver at the COMEX.   Here they are:

Net, JP Morgan delivered 12.2 million ounces of the shiny metal from December 2010 until last week; more than four times as much physical silver as all other market participants combined.  So the idea that JPM is the entity holding down the price of silver is an incontrovertible fact, not a conspiracy theory. It’s not even worth discussing. 

What is worth discussing is how much longer JPM can continue delivering silver at this blistering pace.  JPMs 4-month total would be more than 90% of US mining production for the period.  So how JPM acquires its silver should be of interest, and that requires some speculation.   The largest silver stockpile in World history is a good place to start.  On June 1, 1955 The Wall Street Journal reported that the US government had a “useless” stockpile of about 3 billion ounces of silver, and blasted the Treasury for paying the outrageous price of 90.41 cents for an ounce of silver (click here for excerpt, or here  if you are inclined to pay $4.95 for proof the WSJ was a worthless rag 56 years ago too).


 Fun with Math: If you had 3 billion ounces of something on June 1, 1955 and began selling 1 million ounces per week, you’d run out 57.49 years later, on Tuesday November 27, 2012.


The point is that in 1955, the US government was in possession of more than 10 percent of all silver ever discovered up to that point in human history. Fifty years later, it was all gone according to the 2005 US Geological Survey.   The price of silver has now risen more than 4,000% despite the complete liquidation of the largest stockpile of the stuff ever known.   That’s better than stocks, houses, oil and just about everything else you can imagine, with the exception of gold, which was illegal for US citizens to own in 1955.  One can only wonder what the price might be without that liquidation.  Well, that and who the US government sold all that silver to, and under what terms exactly.  That’s probably a good question to ask your congressman the next time he tells you Social Security is broke.  Anyway, the US government says it doesn’t have any silver left and apparently JPM and the customer(s) they represent have lots and lots. Nothing odd about that, right?

I say “apparently” JPM has lots and lots of silver because they delivered more than 12 million ounces in four months.   I have to wonder how many more times they can pull a rabbit that big out of their hat. In March 2011 folks at the COMEX decided to make JPM’S vault a certified COMEX vault.   As of April 11, that vault contained 30,844 ounces of silver. JPM has averaged about 150,000 ounces in physical settlement per trading day during the past four months. Which means that stash should last about two hours….

Maybe JPM still has lots and lots of silver elsewhere, right?  Certainly they should.  In November 2010, Jason Hommel estimated that JPM has silver obligations totaling 3.3 Billion ounces.   So if Jamie Dimon is in fact the man on the silver mountain (and maybe that explains the picture), why is he sending customers to the COMEX floor?  From the CME group’s YTD metals report:

JPMs customer(s) were by far the biggest net sellers of silver in March 2011, selling 374 contracts (5,000 t oz each), while buying none. So far in April, 119 silver contracts have been issued and JPMs customer have taken 94 of them (79%). Sentiment shifts don’t get any less subtle, even if you ignore the fact that they sold low and bought higher. So either they’re:  

  • suddenly expecting much higher prices 
  •  the most misguided investors on planet Earth, or
  • desperately in need of silver (after all, the stuff is very useful).

(This is the part where you need to think for yourself)

I’ll tell you right now, JPMs apologists are going to scream, “Obviously they’re not the same people!”  and you are free to accept that explanation.  The question remains however that if this party wanted physical silver why wouldn’t they just purchase it directly from JPM?   Wouldn’t JPM be happy to sell some of its hoard, now at 30-year highs directly to a customer?   They should have lots and lots, remember?   And who (besides the US government) would sell everything they have, only to buy it back for more in a month? 

Fun Fact:  JP Morgan’s London Branch is the custodian of the iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and neither the SEC nor the CFTC seem the slightest bit concerned. 

The SLV is the largest silver ETF, holding more than 360 million ounces of the element with the best electrical conductivity. As the prospectus says, “The custodian is responsible for safekeeping the silver owned by the trust….and is responsible for any loss of silver to the trustee only…Because the holders of ishares are not party to the custodian agreement, their claims against the custodian may be limited.”

I expect we will be seeing more silver showing up at JPMs COMEX vault shortly, if only for appearance’s sake.  Remember this:  The supply of a natural resources is finite, the ability to make promises you can’t keep is not.  Few questioned AIGs ability to honor its obligations until it was far too late.  The same kind of ignorance is in play in the silver market today. 

Silver has now embarrassed every pie-charting, asset allocating, Fibonacci retracing, Elliot waving, reversion-to-the-meaning dimwit trying to pass himself off as a “financial professional.”  Most have never recommended silver, and they know tough questions will be coming shortly from their future ex-clients.  So right now they’re praying, to whatever deity people who have based their World view on ignoring the difference constants and variables pray to, that silver is a bubble.  Fat chance.


More Fun Facts (and a bizzare comparison):  As of this writing, the US Treasury has sold 13,803,000 ounces of silver YTD.  At $40 each, that’s about $552mm, or  0.012% of GDP.  Meanwhile, Treasury’s net issuance of new paper has totaled $239B or5.13% of GDP.  If you charted that difference in height, it would be like comparing Dubai’s Burj Khalifa  to a Port-a-Potty (I’m not going to do that).  The Port-a-Potty may not get much respect (and I’ve seen a few woefully disrespected) but is absolutely necessary.  I’m not sure how necessary a giant needle (requiring the cooling equivalent of melting 22 million pounds of ice per day)  in a barren wasteland is. 


Draw your own conclusions regarding  bubbliciousness.  Still I can’t help but getting a little misty when I see the paperbug’s concern for the silverbugs.  Thanks guys, but your sentiments are about as insane as people on the Titanic  screaming to those already in life boats, “Come back!!! This ship is unsinkable and we’ve got technical analysis to PROVE it!”  Sure you do, but methinks you’re just after our lifeboat.

In case you haven’t noticed, the same people who call record numbers of Americans on food stamps a “recovery”, while piling up unpayable debts on others to stay large and in charge, call silverbugs crazy.  They act like trading infinitely printable paper for an irreplaceable vanishing resource, that has also served quite nicely as money throughout human history, is a silly idea.  Last time I checked, scientists haven’t yet found a way to turn bullshit into silver.

In April 2010, Jason Hommel filed an antitrust complaint against JP Morgan with the US Department of Justice, who still haven’t managed to send a single bankster to prison (Madoff turned himself in), so don’t hold your breath.  Taking silver at the artificially low prices still being offered is as close to revenge as the common man is ever going to get.

I leave you with lists of the top five contributors to the campaigns of financial reform “champions”  Chris Dodd and Barney Frank from



If you don’t know why you should own silver, please read:

CME group metals data links:
Month to Date
Year to Date
Silver Stocks (XLS)

Disclosure: Author is an unapologetic conspiracy theorist.

UpdateThis has now been the busiest day ever on the blog (and there’s three more hours to go) .  Thanks to everyone who made it possible, especially, Max Keiser , and Steve Quayle

Another Update: If you are a silverbug (in case you haven’t noticed, I’m proud to be called that), I highly recommend About.Ag.  The site is 100% dedicated to providing accurate information on silver (chemical symbol Ag).  The page explaining the COMEX futures market is a must read.

Candy from Strangers (Corrected)

In Government, Open Thread, Treasuries on Tuesday, August 10, 2010 at 5:33 pm

 Author’s note: Numbers in the original published version of this piece were derived from fed table F.209 not L.209 (in other words, the wrong table). I sincerely apologize to all for the error. And I hope the fact that I’m a dunce won’t distract you from issues I was trying to address. A more detailed description of the error can be found here.

When TrimTabs Charles Biderman questioned the source of the money that propelled stocks 65% from the March 2009 lows, he got beaten with the idiot stick so badly that he turned bullish in April 2010.  Lost in the ensuing choke-out was the fact that no one ever actually answered his question, unless scoffing and muttering “dark pools and stuff,” under your breath counts (and he’s the one who should be wearing the tin-foil hat?).  Here we go again.


The first thing you should notice when looking at The Treasury’s 2010 Q1 Bulletin is that it’s  incomplete, as I’m sure most of Secretary Tim Geithner’s homework assignments were(1).  Of the 12 columns on Table OFS-2 (Estimated Ownership of U.S. Treasury Securities), Turbo managed to fill in only 5 (FYI: it takes Treasury more than two months to prepare the bulletin).

From the data actually present, we can determine that Treasury issued 461.7 Billion in new debt Q1.  That’s not surprising, we’ve been running at the $500 per person per month clip for almost two years now.  What is surprising is that the Fed  &  Intragovernment holdings went down $17B.  Foreigners, God bless ‘em, scooped up an additional $192.5 B, while  US saving bond  holdings were basically flat (-$1.1 B).

Um, we’re out of data now, but not debt.  287.4 Billion  (62%) of  Q1′s public debt is not accounted for on the report.   Fortunately when discussing who could digest that much debt in three months, we can quickly eliminate 6 of the 7 “not available” data points (depository institutions, pension funds, mutual funds, insurance companies, and State & local governments).  The only logical conclusion is at least a quarter trillion  in debt was purchased by “Other Investors” in Q1.

Aren’t you glad we cleared that up?

What’s that?  “Who the hell are Other Investors,” you say?  Good question.  It does seem rather nebulous, especially considering that they are now clearly our best customer(s).   Not very bright though.  They stepped in and bought like crazy as interest rates went to record lows.  Still I think we should send a basket of fruit and a nice thank you note, because without them we would surely have had a failed auction (read Keynesian apocalypse).

The Treasury defines Other Investors as: 

Individuals, Government-sponsored enterprises, brokers and dealers, bank personal trusts and estates, corporate and non-corporate businesses, and other investors.

Thanks Turbo, for narrowing  it down to just about everyone under the sun.

Let’s go ask Ben!

Geithner’s a slacker, this is known, but Fed Chair Ben Bernanke’s SAT score (1590!) suggests analality (?) (mine was considerably lower).   Besides, Treasury’s footnotes on tables OFS-2 tell us that  the source for 6 of the 7 empty columns is the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Flow of Funds Table L.209 (and which was actually released before the Treasury Bulletin – don’t get me started…).

The Fed’s flow of funds data is an exercise in convolution, but it wasn’t too difficult to extract the data missing from the Treasury bulletin.  Here’s the breakdown:

  • Depository Institutions   +$67.2 B (up 32.5% in one quarter!)
  • Private Pension Funds   +$32.4 B
  • State & Local Government Pension Funds  +$7.1 B
  • Insurance Companies  +$2.1 B
  • Mutual Funds  -$13.1 B
  • State & Local Governments  -6.6 B

Depository institutions and Private pensions purchased record amounts of  Treasuries in Q1.  Which means that “Other Investors” accounted for $198 B of the Treasuries issued in Q1.  Yes, I realize that this is somewhat lower than my original estimate, but in my defense that was a logical conclusion.  Who knew banks and private pensions are expecting another stock market collapse?  Nobody at CNBC anyway.  They’re too busy laughing at Main Street for not seeing the awesomeness of the recovery.

Before putting away the Fed’s flow of funds, it is worth noting that brokers and dealers added $8.4 B in holdings and GSEs bought 38 B (both groups are included as other investors and no the GSE number is not a mistake!)(2).  This brings us to the turd in the punchbowl.  The Household sector, who the Fed says purchased a whopping $148 B.  Now before you start thinking your neighbors are taking their unemployment checks and sneaking off to Treasury auctions, listen to what Sprott Asset Management’s Eric Sprott and David Franklin said of the household sector in their December 2009 report entitled, Is it all just a Ponzi Scheme?:

To quote directly from the Flow of Funds Guide, “For example, the amounts of Treasury securities held by all other sectors, obtained from asset data reported by the companies or institutions themselves, are subtracted from total Treasury securities outstanding, obtained from the Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the United States Government and the balance is assigned to the household sector.” (Emphasis ours) So to answer the question – who is the Household Sector? They are a PHANTOM. They don’t exist. They merely serve to balance the ledger in the Federal Reserve’s Flow of Funds report.

I guess that means your neighbor isn’t our superhero, and besides, if he was he’d have a cooler car.  So who are these strangers with candy hell-bent on making sure this sugar high doesn’t end?   I don’t know.  There I said it.  Maybe Charles Biderman gets rattled when everyone calls him a moron, but I’m used to it.  So fire away, but answer the question.

By the end of 2010, Other Investors will own more than 10% of the US public debt (1.5 Trillion or so).  They bought more than 40% of the new debt in Q1.  At what point does this kind of opacity become unacceptable?  Why can’t the Treasury fill out its own bulletin with information already available?  Why do we have to wait five months for information that is so vague, you can’t even call it information with a straight face?

And last but not least, where do we send the fruit basket?

  1. Treasury’s bulletins have always omitted the most recent data – the omissions are not unique to Geithner. The omissions are inexcusable, especially now, but not new. I didn’t explain that because I didn’t think it was particularly relevant and it ruined a perfectly good joke.
  2. This sentence was replaced. Data on the GSEs was omitted from the original post, and the broker and dealers number was changed from -19B to +8.4B.


Other Reading:

Is it all just a Ponzi Scheme? (Sprott & Franklin)

Treasury table OFS-2 (updated and corrected).

How to Stop the Leak – MAGNETIC JUNK SHOT

In BP Oil Spill, Government, Open Thread on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 at 4:57 pm

I know I said I’d wait until Friday before publishing the Gulf oil leak solution, but I don’t see any point in waiting, especially because I don’t believe the govenment or BP is even the slightest bit interested in solving this problem.

I was never able to get an answer about how high off the sea floor the broken pipe is,  so I am presenting two scenarios here:

Scenario #1-

  1. A Heavy metal open cylinder (no ends) is lowered around the leaking pipe.  The cylinder should probably be tapered at the top.
  2. Once in place, you start attaching the biggest baddest neodyium magnets you can find.
  3. Fill with ball bearing, more magnets etc.
  4. Cap with large disc and/or concrete.

 Scenario #2 (if pipe is high enough above ocean floor) –

  1. Apply big magnets directly to pipe.
  2. Shoot magnetic junk into pipe.

So there’s a cheap easy fix, but I don’t expect to see it implemented.

Cap and Trade, here we come…..

(We are in deep trouble America)

Upon further review….

After kicking the concept around with a few friends, and poking around the web a little, I’ve decided this is probably a better illustration:

I Know How to Stop the Oil Leak….

In BP Oil Spill, Government, Open Thread on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 at 11:59 pm

I’m not kidding.

I think everyone in the world is heartbroken watching this disaster unfold.  I’m pretty sure I know how this could be fixed very, very quickly.  It does not involve nuclear weapons, in fact it would have little or no negative environmental impact.

If you’re President of the United States, Tony Hayward or anybody else with the resources and authority to get this done, you need to contact me immediately:

P.S. I want $10 Million when my solution ends this catastrophe.

I will publish the solution June 25.

I apologize for not being more forthcoming, but I think it is important that we recognize the failings of the American status quo.  If the powers that be knew what to do, they’d have done it by now, right?  They don’t.  And the depressing part is no one’s really surprised.  We all know this is what you get when you let circle-jerking academics pass for seasoned problem solvers.  So while I’m digressing…..

Six weeks ago, I applied for a position with the SEC as a “Trading Abuse Specialist.”  Given the opportunity, I know I would excel at such a position (check out the blog, I’ve been doing it for free), but let’s face it, abusive trading is Wall Street’s bread and butter and Bernie Madoff’s “dear friend” Mary Schapiro has no interest in stopping that.  Still a “Hey, thanks for applying,” or even a “Fuck off” would have been nice.  I received no response.  Just like I received no response from the SEC when I tried to report Angelo Mozilo’s insider trading (a $14 million bounty I’ll never see…)

I also recently applied for work at the FBI as a data analyst (I don’t recall the actual title).  I did get a nice “fuck you” back from them.  But not when I reported a US company that makes what can only be described as training equipment for terrorists.  I don’t know what else to call a chamber that simulates a window blowing out of an airplane at 40,000 feet…..

So it should come as no surprise that I don’t actually expect anyone to contact me.

See you Friday!

Update – 06/23/2010 9:55 E.S.T.:

I’ve called BP’s “alternative response” hotline twice this morning, to ask two very simple questions:

1) How far above the Sea floor is the broken pipe?


2) What is the water temperature down there?

The people answering the phone didn’t know….They said, “it’s probably on the website, somewhere”…..Quite honestly, they seemed pre-occupied with asking questions, rather than answering them (Who are you? What’s your idea? etc.).  I have to wonder how serious they are about stopping the leak.

Anyway, I can’t find that info.  You’d think that somebody would have made a little sketch – with a few details by now.  Furthermore, you’d think the people answering the phones would have access to that information.  So here I am waiting for a couple of simple answers from BP.  And waiting…

If anyone knows the answer to my questions, please let me know…..

Update 06/23/2010 12:20 PM EST:  Contacted the Whte House (  Will be publishing the contents of the message shortly.  I’ve also contacted the Dylan Ratigan Show and am posting updates at the Daily Bail.